مشكور :D
استعنا على الشقا بالله !
لا يوجد تعليق أخي العزيز على هذا المقال سوى ما ذكر في المقال نفسه من القراء الغربيين :
"لماذا تصمم على وضع اختبار The Last Remnant مع وجود مشكلة واضحة بينه وبين كروت ATI ؟ وبهذا تكون النتيجة النهائية "متحيزة" لإنفيديا وهذا شيء مضلل لمن يقفزون الى النتائج مباشرةWhy do you keep on including the last remnant test when it's obvious that there is a problem with the ati cards? Therefore the overall results are biased and it's unfair to ati and to the foes who jump directly to the conclusion.
Also when you say *quote* "DirectX 10 crashed at 8x AA and the game and screen went black. Switch to DirectX 9 instead, and the game works at 8x AA and offers frame rates up to 50% higher" *unquote* for HAWX didn't you mean "ati cards were a lot faster that nvidia ones using DirectX 10 thanks to DirectX 10.1 and that was unacceptable. Hence the switch to DirectX 9 instead, and the game works at 8x AA and offers frame rates up to 50% higher for nvidia and ati is fcked again, close one guys".
I am not an ati fanboy but I think TH has got its tongue sticked up a juicy green @ss.
وبالنسبة لإختبارك للعبة H.A.W.X ألا يعني اختيارك لل DX9 بدلاً من DX10 انك فعلاً متحيز لإنفيديا لأن كروت ATI ستعطي أداء أعلى مع DX10.1 وبالطبع لم يمكنك قبول هذا حتى تبين كروت ATI في وضع سيء
أنا لست متحيزاً ل ATI ولكني أعتقد ان Tomshardware على "علاقة حميمة" بإنفيديا
"وما زال "تينو" يضع الإعلانات الدعائية لإنفيديا . لم يذكر أي شيء عن تخفيض الأسعار الكبير من ATI
Tino is putting again a big geforce ad. No mention of recent HUGE Radeon price cuts (eg. Radeon HD 4890 goes for $199.99 - 10$ mail rebate in newegg, and 4850 should go at 99$). And HAWX is again benchmarked without dx10.1 setting because of such crappy results for ATI. And not even a mention such technology exist in the game
ولا يزال يختبر HAWX بدون DX10.1 حتى لا تظهر قوة كروت ATI بل لم يذكر حتى وجود هذا الخيار في اللعبة"
"من غير العدل وضع نتيجة The Last Remnant لأنها تؤثر على النتيجة الكلية وكونك مصمم على فعل هذا فهذا يعني انك متحيز لإنفيديا عن قصد"I think its highly unfair that you would put The Last Remnant in as a benchmark. The game simply hates ATI cards and if you included that game when it came to making a conclusion then I think your intentionally being biased.
Also I'm not sure why your holding the 260 as the best choice. The Zotac one you even picture is priced at $175 at newegg while the HIS 4850 1GB is like $115 at newegg. Sure the 260 outperforms it but when you take that price difference and look at the performance the 4850 1GB is certainly attractive. The 250 1GB lowest price on newegg is $140 and Zotac's costs $154.99 and if you compared the 4850 1GB to it using your own charts you would see the major killer of the sum of fps is largely effected by The Last Remnant.
Speaking of Zotac I noticed that for some reason whenever they are mentioned they get a major ass kissing. While they make good products its clear that there is a bias here. You even picture the Zotac 260 and even gave it the ability to be selected on your own little comparison charts and look what you get when you compare it to normal 260 216sps https://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] .html?prod[2447]=on&prod[2463]=on The exact same results and for some reason you deemed it necessary to list it individually as if it were special.
Next time how about giving a real conclusion instead of a advertisement. Comparing a $115 card to a $175 and pushing Zotac down our throats makes it damn obvious what your doing
"يا إلهي ! لا يستطيع توم أن يتخلى عن إنفيديا أبداً . ATI تقدم أفضل أداء بالنسبة للسعر ولن يغير اختبار The Last Remnant هذا"
Wow! Tom's just cant let nvidia go. ATI clearly has price-performance advantage now. No Last Remnant benchs are gonna change it.
"يبدو أن تينو لم يتعلم مما فعله القراء المتعلمون منذ فترة حين قرروا انهم لن يتسامحون مع مثل هذه المراجعات المتحيزة بشكل سخيف للغاية"Tino must have missed that whole thing a few months back where educated readers decided they weren't going to tolerate such ridiculously biased conclusions. There's only a $5 difference in price between the His 4870 and Zotac 260 on Newegg as I write this (nothing like Tino's claim that the Zotac has a >$35 advantage), and the performance of the two came within 0.5% of each other...DESPITE two extremely pro-NVidia slanted tests (Last Remnant and Hawx).
I actually encourage keeping the Last Remnant test because ATI shouldn't get breaks for poor drivers (or inadequate collaboration with developers), but by that same token if NVidia loses out on lack of 10.1 support that result absolutely needs to be included. TH was actually starting to look credible again, it must have taken you guys months of seriously attentive work and comprehensive benchmarking to regain that...what in the world are you guys thinking starting up this tripe again?
"من يلعب The Last Remnant ؟ انها ليست أفضل ألعاب الحاسب ويجعلني هذا أتساءل لماذا يختار توم هذه اللعبة بالذات لإختبارها؟"Who in all honesty plays "The Last Remnant"? It's hardly the biggest and best PC game on the market right now it just makes me wonder why Toms Hardware would pick such a obscure console port to benchmark video cards on?
"من الجيد انني لست الوحيد الذي يرى التحيز . أتمنى فقط أن "تينو" هو المتحيز لإنفيديا مع عدم قدرته وضع مقارنة أمينة وليس أن موقع كبير مثل TH تضعه إنفيديا أو انتل في جيوبهما !Lol! I'm glad it's not just me!
I'm hoping Tino is simply biased and unable to put together an honest comparison, rather than Tom's hardware being in the pocket of Intel & Nvidea!
All I know is something stinks, as you don't get it this wrong by accident.
كل ما أعرفه هو ان هناك شيء قذر يدور هنا لأن كل هذا لا يمكن أن يحدث بالخطأ"
هذه عينة أخي العزيز
واضح أن الوعي الغربي قوي جداً
المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة seko512
المفضلات