المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة سانشيرو
أخي العزيز يزن ,,
هنا في موقع Tom's Hardware عمل تقرير عن هذه الرقاقة وفي آخر صفحة في الـ Conclusion قال كلام فيه نوع من التحطيم !
مثل:
* Most of the results we found for the new P45 chipset are somewhat disappointing
* we were not able to find true additional value for the end user, as the added features are not necessarily relevant. In addition, the P45 failed to deliver better performance while it increases power consumption over its predecessor—so much for performance per watt.
* Performance-wise, the P45 chipset does not beat the P35, and it is also comparable to the X48
* none of our P45 samples was capable of clearly outperforming the P35 boards when it comes to overclocking. We reached 525 MHz on the Asus P5Q-E, which can also be reached by some P35 products.
* Finally, performance for USB 2.0 and SATA operation has slightly decreased as well. We found that the ICH9 is quicker when it comes to USB 2.0 throughput and maximum transfer rates in RAID operation.
* Finally, our conclusion is simple: the P45 is a transitional product that makes limited sense. It is not worth purchasing a P45 platform system
* If you want to buy a new Intel system today, P35 will most likely be the best option
وغيره مما قالوا ! ..
ما رأيك في اختباراتهم ؟ ..
وما الفرق بين اللوحتين ASUS P5Q Deluxe و ASUS P5Q-E ؟! ..
شكرًا لك ,,
المفضلات