لقد بحثت طويلا عن مقارنه بين المعالجات ليس عن طريق ادائها في الألعاب ولكن من حيث ادائها في كل من Mental ray وال Vray واليكم هذه المقارنه التي توضح تفوق معالجات ال Thuban علي ال Bulldozer وعلي ال 2500K ايضا
3d Studio Max 2011 - Mental Ray
We now move on to the practical tests, firstly with a 3D rendering in 3d Studio Max 2011 using the Mental Ray rendering engine on an Evermotion scene. We carried the rendering out at 600*375 so as not to extend the length of the test too much.
The FX-8150 was a disappointment here, not managing any better than the Phenom II X6 1100T. The FX-6100 though sold at the same price as the 1055T, is a good way behind. The AMD offer is however still well positioned opposite the Intel offer at the same tarif, with the FX-8150 falling between the 2500K and the 2600K, which is no great exploit when you consider the excessive number of transistors used.
3d Studio Max 2011 - V-Ray 2.0
Still in 3d Studio Max 2011, we changed the engine for the more popular third party engine, V-Ray 2. We used another version of the same scene prepared by Evermotion for this engine, still with a 600*375 rendering. Rendering times are a good deal faster but of course we’re not carrying out a comparison of the engines themselves or the quality of the final files.
This time the FX-8150 is significantly up on the 1100T, but the FX-6100 remains down on the 1055T, which is nevertheless sold at the same price. This allows the FX-8150 to get closer to the 2600K, though there is still a comfortable gap between the two.
لقد لاحظت ندرة المقارنات بين ال 1090T وال 1100T مع ال FX 6100 ولذلك انصحكم بمراجعة رابط المراجعه بالأسفل
المصدر:
https://www.behardware.com/articles/...es-on-am3.html
المفضلات